ITKIT

Justice · 05 / 20

OneJustice

Lawful investigation and case management

From the problem to how we solve it

OneJustice prototype screens

October 2026

Interactive prototype · synthetic data only

The problem

From the scene to the court

1

Case tracking is fragmented across paper and spreadsheets.

2

Digital evidence lacks provable integrity.

3

Referrals between institutions are slow and hard to audit.

The scene · Police · Laboratory · Prosecution · Court

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

The problem

Our answer

OneJustice · Ask for a demonstration

Controlled case files from incident to closure, with digital evidence integrity, chain of custody and lawful exchange between police, prosecution, courts and laboratories.

How it works · 1 of 7

Field seizure

Labelled, sealed, photographed, hashed

OneJustice starts the chain of custody where the evidence is found, even without signal.

Field seizure on a phone: evidence label, seal number, hashed photos and a no-signal notice

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

How it works

How it works · 2 of 7

Chain of custody

Two signatures for every hand-over

Every hand-over is signed by both people, with time, place and condition.

Chain of custody entries and the form to record a transfer with two-person sign-off

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

How it works

How it works · 3 of 7

Integrity

Proof that nothing changed

Anyone can check that a file is exactly what was seized. Lab reports keep every version.

Digital evidence item with its acquisition hash and a matching integrity check

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

How it works

How it works · 4 of 7

Judicial decision

The judge decides. The system records.

Judges see the application, not the police file, and no machine suggests a decision.

Judge’s workbench: an application compared with what was granted before

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

How it works

How it works · 5 of 7

Court exchange

Signed envelopes, time-stamped receipts

Police, prosecution and courts exchange only signed, listed documents. No shared database.

Court document exchange with a signed manifest and a time-stamped docketing receipt

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

How it works

How it works · 6 of 7

Hearings

No detention review missed

The court calendar guards legal deadlines and the right to an interpreter.

Court hearings calendar with a detention-review deadline and an interpreter booking

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

How it works

How it works · 7 of 7

Oversight

Independent oversight, read-only

An independent office sees every access, and changes nothing.

Independent oversight dashboard, read-only, with break-glass reviews and audit trail integrity

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

How it works

What it includes

20 screens and workflows in the prototype

Case file and timeline

The assigned investigation team and their supervisor

State your purpose

Anyone opening a case: investigators, supervisors, evidence staff

Field seizure (mobile)

Investigators and scene officers carrying out a search

Evidence registry and chain of custody

Investigators, evidence custodians and lab staff

Digital evidence item

Investigators and forensic examiners

Judge’s workbench

Investigating judges

Court document exchange

Court registry clerks; senders in police and prosecution see their own receipts

Oversight and audit

Independent oversight auditors

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

What it includes

Built to standards

International standards it is built to

StandardWhat it covers in OneJustice
ISO/IEC 27037:2012Identification and collection of digital evidence at the scene
ISO/IEC 27037:2012Preservation: documenting every custody transfer
ISO/IEC 27042:2015Analysis and interpretation of digital evidence
UNODC goCASE (functional benchmark)Integrated investigation and prosecution case management
ICCPR, article 9(3) and 9(4)Prompt judicial review of detention
ICCPR, article 14(1) and 14(3)(a), (f)Public hearing, language and interpreter
OASIS LegalXML Electronic Court Filing v5.01 (Committee Specification 01, 2023)Filing review, docketing, service and court scheduling
ISO 15489-1:2016Records controls: retention and disposition

We align with these standards; certification is issued by accredited bodies, not by ITKIT.

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

What it includes

Connects to

What OneJustice works with

Prosecution and court systems via restricted gateway

Forensic laboratory systems

OneID for staff authentication

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

What it includes

Safeguards

What OneJustice will never do

No mass surveillance, political profiling, bulk biometric identification or automated guilt scoring.

Police, prosecution, judiciary and oversight keep separate security domains.

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

Delivery

How delivery works

Start small, prove it, then scale and hand over

6–10 weeks

Assess

Map what already exists and decide, system by system: reuse, integrate, modernise or build.

4–6 months

Pilot

OneJustice at one authority, with real users and a measured outcome, on national infrastructure.

12–24 months

Scale

Roll out by region and service, sharing identity, integration and audit.

Agreed per contract

Operate and transfer

We run it with your team, train them, then hand over operations, code escrow and keys.

Durations are typical ranges, fixed per contract

ITKIT · OneJustice · Prototype screens, synthetic data

Delivery

Next step

Ask ITKIT for a guided demonstration of the OneJustice prototype with synthetic cases.

OneJustice. Lawful, provable, accountable.

1 · Demo

A guided session on the OneJustice prototype

2 · Assess

6–10 weeks to map what exists and fix the pilot scope

3 · Pilot

4–6 months with real users and a measured result

ITKIT · [contact name, email and phone]

Thank you

F = full screen